Report By: Mac Samah in Nimba County
Nimba County – Citizens of Ghahn Town, Nimba County have again alarmed over the terms and conditions that led to the construction of a US$30,000 guesthouse for the community.
The cost of the project was a 20% allotment to the community as part of the County Social Development Funds (CSDF). The amount was allocated based on the use of the Yekepa-to-Buchanan railroad – which passes through the town – beginning 2012.
The community then allotted the fund for the construction of a guesthouse to help bring relief to travelers who want to lodge.
But the money for the project was misappropriated, according to the citizens.
During a press conference held in the town in early February 2018, the town’s development chairman Mr. James Gartei expressed disappointment in the county administration and the construction company hired to implement the guesthouse project.
Gartei said the community submitted the blueprint of the building with the bill of quantity (BOQ) for the construction of a modern structure.
“On the contrary, an egg-type of structure was forced on the community called guesthouse. How will you say you used $30,000.00 for public building and there’s no back door or fitting ventilation,” said Gartei.
Several efforts to contact the former Nimba County Superintendent, Mrs. Christina Dagadu, who was in charge of the county administration when the deal was signed, were unsuccessful. But in an interview with Radio Gheamahn, the CEO of the construction company, Saye Sylvester Mianah, said he received only US$26,000 for the project, adding that Representative Larry Younquoi and Commissioner Nya Dakiayee should account for the balance US$4,000.
But both men have since refuted Mr. Mianah’s claim.
Meanwhile, citizens of Gbahn are concern about the remaining US$4000, and they are demanding a full report of the amount before accepting the guesthouse.
The claim is rigorous and the content is demonstrably true.
The statement is correct, although it needs clarification additional information or context.
Evidence publicly available neither proves nor disproves the claim. More research is needed.
The statement contains correct data, but ignores very important elements or is mixed with incorrect data giving a different, inaccurate or false impression.
The claim is inaccurate according to the best evidence publicly available at this time.
Upon further investigation of the claim, a different conclusion was determined leading to the removal of the initial determination.
A rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comment that is somewhat likely to make you leave a discussion or give up on sharing your perspective. Based on algorithmic detection of issues around toxicity, obscenity, threats, insults, and hate speech;