Written by Maxwell K. Saah
Lofa County – A Liberian government delegation has held an intervention meeting in Bluyeama Clan, Lofa County where a company has been accused by locals for illegal logging and failing to impact the affected communities.
The firm, Sing Africa Plantation Liberia Limited, is carrying out massive logging of a vast forest at the border Gbarpolu and Lofa Counties.
There has been ongoing tension between the firm and the four communities in Gbarpolu County for the past three years. Several interventions by the former superintendents of Lofa and Gbarpolu Counties failed to mitigate the dispute.
The disagreement resulted to the seizure of some of the company’s equipment by citizens of the four communities. They are demanding that the firm performs its social corporate responsibilities.
The communities are requesting roads, schools, clinics and hand pumps.
The recent meeting, held on May 26, came following a fact-finding meeting held on May 10 when officials launched an investigation to determine alleged unlawfully logging operation in Bluyeama forest.
The government delegation included the Managing Director of the Forestry Development, Deputy Ministers of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and the Superintendent of Lofa and Gbarpolu Counties.
The community actions have halted the operations of the logging company.
Tamba Kamba, Lofa County Superintendent, requested the company to present all necessary documents relating to their operations in the county.
Superintendent Kamba said he wanted to know the legal status of the company in order to handle the dispute between all parties involved.
He said it was important to have a clear understanding of the company operations and its social corporate responsibility to the affected communities.
Gbarpolu County Superintendent, J. Keyah Saah concurred with Kamba, calling on the communities to hold on until the investigation is concluded. He, however, promised the communities that all necessary social benefits will be provided by the firm.
During the meeting, the company also promised to meet up with its social corporate responsibilities for the communities in the next five months but didn’t provide reasons for failing to impact the communities where it has been operating for the over three years.
The claim is rigorous and the content is demonstrably true.
The statement is correct, although it needs clarification additional information or context.
Evidence publicly available neither proves nor disproves the claim. More research is needed.
The statement contains correct data, but ignores very important elements or is mixed with incorrect data giving a different, inaccurate or false impression.
The claim is inaccurate according to the best evidence publicly available at this time.
Upon further investigation of the claim, a different conclusion was determined leading to the removal of the initial determination.
A rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comment that is somewhat likely to make you leave a discussion or give up on sharing your perspective. Based on algorithmic detection of issues around toxicity, obscenity, threats, insults, and hate speech;