Connect with us

Facts Checked Reports

Fact Check: NO, Liberians Have Not Faced Three U.S Government’s Magnitsky Sanctions in 12 Months.

Paynesville – A Liberian youth activist Martin K.N. Kollie on August 13, 2021, claimed through a Facebook post that the United States of America has imposed three different Magnitsky sanctions on Liberia in 12 months. But when we checked his claim, the result shows that he was incorrect.

Report By: Grace Z. Gaie  | Local Voices Liberia Fact Checker

According to the Congressional Research Services, a public policy research institute of the United States Congress, the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act authorizes the President of the United States to impose economic sanctions and deny entry into US territory any foreign person identified as engaging in human rights abuses or corruption.

This means Magnitsky Sanction is an economic sanction imposed on individuals for human rights abuses and corruption. The Global Magnitsky Act takes the terms of a prior Russia-focused law, the Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012.

The Act, according to our search, was named after a tax lawyer and auditor in Russia who documented rampant tax fraud and other corruption by individuals associated with the Russian government.

Identified individuals who are enlisted under the Magnitsky sanction are subjected to blocking of assets under U.S. jurisdiction, prohibited from U.S. transactions, and denied entry into the United States.

How many Liberians were enlisted under the Magnitsky Sanctions?

According to the U.S Department of the Treasury on the International Anti-Corruption Day, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) targeted corrupt actors and their networks across several countries in Africa and Asia.

The report states that the action was taken pursuant to Executive Order 13818, which builds upon and implements the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, and targets perpetrators of corruption and serious human rights abuse.

On a list of individuals and their associations enlisted under the Magnitsky sanction on December 9, 2020, was Grand Cape Mount County Senator Cllr. Harry Varney Gboto-Nambi Sherman who was also the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, when he was sanctioned.

The report alleged that Cllr. Sherman “manipulated judges and routinely paid them to decide cases in his favor and allegedly facilitated payments to Liberian politicians to support the impeachment of a judge who has ruled against him”.

Also on September 10, 2020 the then U S Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo in a statement announced a public designation of the former Director of Passport and Visas at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mr. Andrew Wonplo. The Public Designation of Mr. Wonplo and his immediate family members was due to his involvement in significant corruption at the Liberia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, according to the public designation released by the former US official.


Based on our check, it was established that only two Liberians have been sanctioned by the U.S government since December 2020. They are the U.S. Magnitsky sanction placed on Senator Sherman and the public designation of Mr. Wonplo by the U.S State Department. Therefore, the claim by Martin K.N. Kollie that Liberia has had three different US-imposed Magnitsky sanctions in 12 months is incorrect.



Liberia has had three different US imposed Magnitsky Sanctions in 12months.



You may contact us to fact check any claim or information relative to Liberia. Contact us on:
 or  WhatsApp: +231880986778

Local Voices Liberia is a network of dedicated Liberian journalists based in the 15 counties working to lift the development concerns and progress of rural communities.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



The claim is rigorous and the content is demonstrably true.

Half True

The statement is correct, although it needs clarification additional information or context.


Evidence publicly available neither proves nor disproves the claim. More research is needed.


The statement contains correct data, but ignores very important elements or is mixed with incorrect data giving a different, inaccurate or false impression.


The claim is inaccurate according to the best evidence publicly available at this time.


Upon further investigation of the claim, a different conclusion was determined leading to the removal of the initial determination.


A rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comment that is somewhat likely to make you leave a discussion or give up on sharing your perspective. Based on algorithmic detection of issues around toxicity, obscenity, threats, insults, and hate speech;

More in Facts Checked Reports