Connect with us

Facts Checked Reports

Fact Checking Finance Minister Samuel Tweah’s Statement About Government’s Fuel Consumption in ‘Last Fiscal Year’

Paynesville – While appearing on a popular radio show on state broadcaster on March 2, Finance Minister Samuel D. Tweah made several comments about the state of Liberia’s economy including the government’s spending on fuel during the last fiscal year.

Report by: Varney Kelvin Sirleaf | LVL Fact Checker

Minister Tweah emphasized the decline in government spending on fuel, disclosing that the government spent US$9 million on fuel in the last fiscal year.

Because the Minister claim was narrowed to the last fiscal year, we review the 2020/2021 national budget, which was the last fiscal budget, to compare the budgetary allocation with the amount the Minister claimed was expended.

When LVL checked the 2020/2021 fiscal budget, the portion of budget that captures the expenditure summary of goods and services shows that the total cost of fuel consumption allocation was US$7,862,411.

The screenshot above shows budget line for fuel and lubricants in the national budget

This budget detail states that US$4,638,136 was to be spent on fuel and lubricants for vehicles while US$3,219,285 was allocated for fuel and lubricants for generator while another US$5,000 was spent on fuel and lubricants. This brought the total fuel consumption allotment in the 2020/2021 budget to US$7,862,411.

In addition to the US$7,862,411 captured in the 2020/2021 fiscal budget, the special extended budget to complement the year 2021 states that 4,795, 897 was allotted for fuel and lubricants. Of this amount, US$ 3,332,049 was allotted for fuel and lubricants for vehicles while US$1,463,848 was allotted for fuel and lubricants for generators.

A screenshot a the 2021 special national budget covering fuel and lubricants

So, if you do a summation of the two allotments in the 2020/2021 fiscal budget and the special extended budget for 2021, you will have a total allotment of US$12,658,308.

However, because Minister Tweah did not claim that the amount in the extended budget is considered part of the 2020/2021 fiscal year, we cannot conclude that the total allotment for fuel in the two budgets (2020/2021 fiscal budget and the 2021 extended special budget) was spent in 2021. This is because the 2020/2021 budget also covered expenditures in 2020.


Results of figure allocated for consumption of fuel in the 2020/2021 fiscal budget shows that the Government of Liberia allotted US$7,862,411 with an additional allotment of 4,795, 897 for fuel in the extended budget. However, because allotment is not the same as expenditure, it is also difficult to conclude that US$9 million was spent on fuel consumption as claimed by Minister Tweah.

Meanwhile, if we consider only the amount allotted in the 2020/2021 fiscal budget which is US$7, 862,411, we can also conclude that an additional US$1,137,589 was spent on fuel consumption in the last fiscal year.

On the other hand, if we consider the total amount allotted in the 2020/201 fiscal budget and the 2021 extended budget, which brings the figure to the total of US$12,658,308, we will also conclude that if US$9 million was spent as claimed by Minister Tweah in the 2020/2021 fiscal year then there was a surplus of US$3,658,308. This makes the claim by Minister Tweah that “US$9 million was spent on fuel consumption in the last (2020/2021 fiscal year” to be a bit ambiguous because the allotment in that fiscal budget is less than what the Minister claimed was expended. We also noted that budgetary allocation or allotment is not the same as expenditure – the allotment may be less, but the expenditure can be more or vice versa.

You may contact us to fact check any claim or information relative to Liberia. Contact us on:
 or  WhatsApp: +231880986778


Local Voices Liberia is a network of dedicated Liberian journalists based in the 15 counties working to lift the development concerns and progress of rural communities.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



The claim is rigorous and the content is demonstrably true.

Half True

The statement is correct, although it needs clarification additional information or context.


Evidence publicly available neither proves nor disproves the claim. More research is needed.


The statement contains correct data, but ignores very important elements or is mixed with incorrect data giving a different, inaccurate or false impression.


The claim is inaccurate according to the best evidence publicly available at this time.


Upon further investigation of the claim, a different conclusion was determined leading to the removal of the initial determination.


A rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comment that is somewhat likely to make you leave a discussion or give up on sharing your perspective. Based on algorithmic detection of issues around toxicity, obscenity, threats, insults, and hate speech;

More in Facts Checked Reports